Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 16:09:14 +0200 From: "barbara" <barbara.xxx1975@libero.it> To: "glen\.j\.barber" <glen.j.barber@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD-8 and portsnap Message-ID: <KNE7BE$52FFD73D782F6FA63E2EAFCC0B6339D5@libero.it>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 9:50 AM, barbara<barbara.xxx1975@libero.it> wro=
te:
> >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 3:23 AM, barbara<barbara.xxx1975@libero.it> =
wrote:
> >> > Why portsnap doesn't provide INDEX-8?
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> Hi, Barbara
> >>
> >> They appear on my machine:
> >>
> >> %ls /usr/ports/INDEX-*
> >> /usr/ports/INDEX-5 =A0 =A0 =A0/usr/ports/INDEX-7 =A0 =A0 =A0/usr/por=
ts/INDEX-8.bz2
> >> /usr/ports/INDEX-6 =A0 =A0 =A0/usr/ports/INDEX-8
> >
> > If you remove them, you will see that INDEX-8 is missing.
> > Also check the dates of the files.
> > This will make portversion misbehave.
> >
>
> I believe that is true with anything in ${PORTSDIR} -- if you remove a
> ${CATEGORY}/${PORT}, it will not be replaced through portsnap. I am
> not sure if this is true for c(v)sup, as I don't use it for my ports
> tree, but I expect it would restore the missing directory/files/etc.
>
If you remove those files and run portsnap fetch update again, you will f=
ind only fresh INDEX-[5-7].
Maybe it's caused by the fact INDEX-8 is not built on portsnap servers, b=
ut I really don't know.
Barbara
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?KNE7BE$52FFD73D782F6FA63E2EAFCC0B6339D5>