Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 15:31:38 +0200 From: Fabian Keil <freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r286223 - head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs Message-ID: <4b278e01.11dc4bd9@fabiankeil.de> In-Reply-To: <20150803120359.GC2072@kib.kiev.ua> References: <201508030934.t739YAkT026668@repo.freebsd.org> <20150803094730.GA24698@zxy.spb.ru> <55BF431E.3020601@freebsd.org> <2757800.HIDNx1G49O@overcee.wemm.org> <20150803111942.GB2072@kib.kiev.ua> <55BF557B.60009@multiplay.co.uk> <20150803120359.GC2072@kib.kiev.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/w.yZ0U=B7895wA6bYSTtgdt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 12:50:19PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > > For this change I don't want to get into fixing the thread0 stack size,= =20 > > which can be done later, just > > to provide a reasonable warning to the user that smaller values could=20 > > cause a panic. >=20 > Hmm, is it limited to the thread0 only ? I.e., would only increasing > the initial thread stack size be enough to boot the kernel ? The zfs > threads do request larger stack size, I know this. >=20 > Can somebody test the following patch in the i386 configuration which > does not boot ? Will do. Fabian --Sig_/w.yZ0U=B7895wA6bYSTtgdt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlW/bToACgkQBYqIVf93VJ2HrQCfVu+06/iS6s3+AUsAGCbaENnr +tsAoK5glCAgz5o3aM2q9Jyk5X9edAPB =qiKs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/w.yZ0U=B7895wA6bYSTtgdt--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4b278e01.11dc4bd9>