Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 18:52:34 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Alex Zepeda <jazepeda@pacbell.net> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>, David Greenman <dg@root.com>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, Sean Eric Fagan <sef@kithrup.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PATCH for testing Message-ID: <19991119105234.EE9301C6D@overcee.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:31:58 PST." <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911182331120.338-100000@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alex Zepeda wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 1999, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > In message <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911182311590.338-100000@localhost> Alex Zepeda w
rites:
> > : ps -e w/out -U only shows variables for processes owned by that user, no?
> >
> > ps -ea.
>
> Then perhaps -a and -U should be disabled? *grin*
I can't believe this is still being discussed! This was "fixed" two days ago
so that 'ps -e' by a normal user can only see the environment of processes
that they own.. No matter whether they use -a, -U, etc. Root can (of course)
still see the environment of all processes.
-stable is a different matter.
Cheers,
-Peter
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991119105234.EE9301C6D>