Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 00:09:45 -0000 From: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk> To: "Mikhail Teterin" <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: sos@freebsd.org, "Mikhail T." <mi@aldan.algebra.com>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pitiful performance of an SATA150 drive Message-ID: <00e401c63d8d$9fb54d20$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> References: <200603010505.k2155HfQ003205@aldan.algebra.com> <200603011634.19617.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <007c01c63d86$7bff2ab0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <200603011904.43830.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think one of us misunderstood. I mean when you created the array setting
the block size there to different values. Not the block size ( bs= ) to dd.
Steve
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mikhail Teterin" <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>
середа 01 березень 2006 18:18, Steven Hartland Ви написали:
> Have you tried changing the block size? Changing here increased
> from 8Mb/s -> 150Mb/s iirc when moving to the lowest available
> block size option.
Yes, I have. From my earlier e-mail in this thread (Message-Id
<200603011107.09942@aldan>):
dd of=/dev/ad8 if=/dev/zero bs=1m
631242752 bytes transferred in 91.039066 secs (6933757 bytes/sec)
================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it.
In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137
or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00e401c63d8d$9fb54d20$b3db87d4>