Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:08:10 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Mars G. Miro" <marsgmiro@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: linprocfs and linux_base port upgrade Message-ID: <20060222030810.GA75798@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <28edec3c0602211901j63066e01te585c12a42057d1e@mail.gmail.com> References: <28edec3c0602211753p7290e85q3fb23d799c0cf0fc@mail.gmail.com> <20060222015924.GA74781@xor.obsecurity.org> <28edec3c0602211901j63066e01te585c12a42057d1e@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:01:57AM +0800, Mars G. Miro wrote: > > No, it's because it tried and failed to umount linprocfs. Presumably > > you didnt have linprocfs mounted in your jail, but some packages >=20 > Well mounting/unmounting stuff inside the jail is a pain. I now recall > I had to mount linprocfs from the host to the jail, thus I was able to > build them. Hrm, perhaps its time for jail_<jailname>_linprocfs_enable > (as with devfs inside a jail) ... I think you're missing my point: if you don't have linprocfs mounted, ports like jdk will fail. If you do have it mounted, ports like linux_base will fail [because they need to umount it and remount it]. The latter should be fixed so that you can consistently set up a jail and have it work in both cases. Kris --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD+9WaWry0BWjoQKURAmfRAJ9m+TbblEePM4L2w73ksi7rzjuk4wCcDCD5 4cFR2+3rsp91vF3MUAEZby8= =1/eF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060222030810.GA75798>