Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 13:29:00 +0300 From: Ivailo Tanusheff <i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg> To: Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jails and IP Aliasing Message-ID: <OF5FDB67E0.DA5F60A3-ONC2257480.0039800F-C2257480.00399DAC@procreditbank.bg> In-Reply-To: <200807081136.31140.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
No, I am right.
Try it yourself and you will see that solves the issue. I have several
jails on different machines and this way the system works without any
error or problem.
Try it and see it :)
Regards,
Ivailo Tanusheff
Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
Sent by: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
08.07.2008 12:38
To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
cc
Subject
Re: Jails and IP Aliasing
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 11:13:04 Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I guess the problem is with your netmask and respectivly the broadcast
> adrresses for the jails.
> It should be:
>
> inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
> inet 10.0.1.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
> inet 10.0.1.4 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
You guess wrong. Aliases SHOULD (as in IETF RFC should) have
255.255.255.255
netmask.
--
Mel
Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
and never get to the software part.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?OF5FDB67E0.DA5F60A3-ONC2257480.0039800F-C2257480.00399DAC>