Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 22:33:46 -0400 From: Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com> To: Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, Alexander Sanda <entropy@compufit.at>, wwoods@cybcon.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc 2.8 Message-ID: <20089.903839626@brown.pfcs.com> In-Reply-To: Alex's (garbanzo@hooked.net) message dated Sat, 22 Aug 1998 19:15:42. <Pine.BSF.4.00.9808221903001.2174-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
While it's been several months since I last did a performance comparison between TenDRA and gcc/egcs, I remember that the TenDRA-compiled code was significantly slower than the code produced by gcc or egcs. I could be mistaken. OTOH, I have some code that uses some "extensions" provided by gcc (labels as values) that I just haven't figured out how to get TenDRA to compile. It's no big deal if this code won't compile with TenDRA - it would just give me another set of routines where I could do a performance test. I think I'll try compiling another package with TenDRA that has a "useful" benchmark. I'll let folks know if I learn anything new. H To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20089.903839626>