Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:46:01 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: An observation Message-ID: <20050214004601.0150177a@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <65856299.20050213233912@wanadoo.fr> References: <420FCA6C.7070604@makeworld.com> <1987008862.20050213232914@wanadoo.fr> <65856299.20050213233912@wanadoo.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:39:12 +0100 Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > Anthony Atkielski writes: > > > I put it that way in my reply template, since I normally reply to the > > list, and not to the individual poster, and I get tired of cutting and > > pasting the correct address. BTW, there's enough MUAs that allow one to map keys combinations to reply-all, reply-list, reply-sender. > Actually, that's something different. > > My reply template directs the reply to the list, rather than to the > sender, so that I don't have to change the destination address for every > post (I never send replies to list messages to the original poster, > since that creates a lot of overhead for the original poster and a lot > of duplicated text for the reply). So you choose to disobey more that one thing from our mailing lists rules :-( -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050214004601.0150177a>