Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 22:05:40 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com> Cc: "Julian Elischer" <julian@elischer.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG, "Long, Scott" <Scott_Long@adaptec.com>, re@FreeBSD.ORG, "Murray Stokely" <murray@freebsdmall.com> Subject: Re: Bluetooth code Message-ID: <4259.1036703140@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 07 Nov 2002 12:54:24 PST." <031401c2869f$db71b720$52557f42@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <031401c2869f$db71b720$52557f42@errno.com>, "Sam Leffler" writes: >I made a quick pass over this code. It's not clear to me why this stuff is >or should be dependent on netgraph. The code looks to support a new >protocol domain and sockets within that domain so it would seem possible for >it to stand apart from netgraph. A bluetooth implementation that was not >tied to netgraph would be preferrable as freebsd users would get the >benefits of additional (non-freebsd users) working with the code. > >Specific stuff: > >1. Why isn't btsockstat integrated into netstat? Actually, isn't netstat(8) hairy enough as it is ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4259.1036703140>