Date: Fri, 6 Sep 1996 10:11:11 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: michaelh@cet.co.jp Cc: terry@lambert.org, p.richards@elsevier.co.uk, rkw@dataplex.net, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Latest Current build failure Message-ID: <199609061711.KAA11386@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.93.960906102955.24754D-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> from "Michael Hancock" at Sep 6, 96 11:30:25 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > The old saw: how do you sanely implement revoloution? The US has a > > complete governmental overthrow every 4-8 years, and does so without > > blood running in the streets. All we are discussing here is a change > > in the rules of order -- we don't even want an overthrow. > > Does revolution mean the government must sign a contract accepting > responsibility for all potential damage for an unspecified period of time? Yes. It means subjecting themselves to charges of malfeasance of office, and or impeachment proceedings, followed by criminal charges. The point of an oath of office is to establish this accountability. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609061711.KAA11386>