Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 13:54:19 -0400 From: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis) To: Jeff Hupp <jhupp@black.gensys.com> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.1R vs 050196SNAP Message-ID: <199605221754.NAA26660@etinc.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Dennis shaped the electrons to the following form: >: >: Can anyone, in a nutshell please, give me a simple bullet list of the >: most compelling reasons (excluding obscure device support) to >: run the SNAP over 2.1R. >: > As an ISP you don't want to run a SNAP. But do go grab the -STABLE >code! This has made a world of diffrence in uptime, gets you BSDI 2.0 >compatablity, and a much improved Adaptec driver. Likely more, but that's >what was important to me. Is anyone running our product in -stable? Dennis ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Emerging Technologies, Inc. http://www.etinc.com Synchronous Communications Cards and Routers For Discriminating Tastes. 56k to T1 and beyond. Frame Relay, PPP, HDLC, and X.25 for BSD/OS, FreeBSD and LINUX
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605221754.NAA26660>