Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 4 May 2007 16:51:05 +1000 (EST)
From:      Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
To:        Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org, "Sean C. Farley" <sean-freebsd@farley.org>, Ulrich Spoerlein <uspoerlein@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: acd and iostat [was Re: FreeBSD vs Region Code DVDs]
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.1070504164043.16876D-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au>
In-Reply-To: <463AD28B.9070709@samsco.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 4 May 2007, Scott Long wrote:
 > Ian Smith wrote:
 > > On Thu, 3 May 2007, Scott Long wrote:
 > > 
 > >  > Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
 > > [..]
 > >  > > PS: why is iostat(1) not working for acd(4) devices?
 > >  > 
 > >  > Because acd doesn't make use of the standard kernel facilities that make
 > >  > iostat work.  It's a deliberate choice by the driver author.
 > > 
 > > Same for systat -vm of course.  I guess this was a regression, as acdX
 > > used to show up fine in 4.X in {sys,io}stat, whether or not also showing
 > > cdX (with atapicam).  I often used to watch it while testing burned CDs. 
 > > 
 > > Was that because of an API change to said kernel facilities, perhaps?
 > > 
 > > Cheers, Ian
 > > 
 > 
 > No, the devstat kernel API hasn't changed in since it was introduced 
 > nearly 10 years ago.

Thanks.  The only other reason I can see for removing acdX from these
stats would be to save on some admittedly precious screen real estate.

Cheers, Ian




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.1070504164043.16876D-100000>