Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:55:16 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: An observation Message-ID: <591901175.20050213235516@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <20050214004601.0150177a@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <420FCA6C.7070604@makeworld.com> <1987008862.20050213232914@wanadoo.fr> <65856299.20050213233912@wanadoo.fr> <20050214004601.0150177a@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ion-Mihai Tetcu writes: > BTW, there's enough MUAs that allow one to map keys combinations to > reply-all, reply-list, reply-sender. MUAs allow lots of things, especially the better ones. MTAs do likewise. > So you choose to disobey more that one thing from our mailing lists > rules :-( No. I've discovered that the "reply-to" is redirected traffic from advocacy to questions, however, and I've corrected that. It was not clear from the preceding posts that this was the problem. -- Anthony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?591901175.20050213235516>