Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 12:32:56 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, "Gary B. Clark II" <gclarkii@main.brewich.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Motif question Message-ID: <199801071932.MAA02433@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199801071929.LAA01483@rah.star-gate.com> References: <199801071817.LAA01786@mt.sri.com> <199801071929.LAA01483@rah.star-gate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I have both V1.2 and V2.0 (both from Xinside), but neither of them work > > reliably if I use them replace the LessTif shlib. The former dies with > > __Xcatgets or somesuch runtime link errors, and the latter just dies > > randomly, usually as soon as I try to bring up any graphic component. > I don't have any such problems over here with Motif V2.0 and jdk1.1.5 compiled > on my system. whenever I run the swing components demo it seems to work > over here . I haven't test it java extensively since I just finished > compiling java about 20 minutes ago 8) That makes sense, since my JDK1.1.2 compiled privately against Motif worked *great* for most things. It seemed to work as well as the Sun JDK under light testing. However, I wasn't able to replace the LessTif library with the Motif binary in the publically available binary release, so that's why I applaud dap's patch. This way I can compile up my own 'private' release that uses Motif, which I already know will work better. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801071932.MAA02433>