Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 7 Jan 1998 12:32:56 -0700
From:      Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To:        Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Cc:        Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, "Gary B. Clark II" <gclarkii@main.brewich.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Motif question 
Message-ID:  <199801071932.MAA02433@mt.sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <199801071929.LAA01483@rah.star-gate.com>
References:  <199801071817.LAA01786@mt.sri.com> <199801071929.LAA01483@rah.star-gate.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I have both V1.2 and V2.0 (both from Xinside), but neither of them work
> > reliably if I use them replace the LessTif shlib.  The former dies with
> > __Xcatgets or somesuch runtime link errors, and the latter just dies
> > randomly, usually as soon as I try to bring up any graphic component.

> I don't have any such problems over here with Motif V2.0 and jdk1.1.5 compiled
> on my system. whenever I run the swing components demo it seems to work
> over here . I haven't test it java extensively since I just finished
> compiling java about 20 minutes ago 8)

That makes sense, since my JDK1.1.2 compiled privately against Motif
worked *great* for most things.  It seemed to work as well as the Sun
JDK under light testing.

However, I wasn't able to replace the LessTif library with the Motif
binary in the publically available binary release, so that's why I
applaud dap's patch.  This way I can compile up my own 'private' release
that uses Motif, which I already know will work better.


Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801071932.MAA02433>