Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 07 Mar 2015 11:46:27 +0000
From:      Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
To:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS Deadlock?
Message-ID:  <54FAE513.3030107@multiplay.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <54FAE018.8080509@sorbs.net>
References:  <CAM72HBb0C-DQszMZFH706rP4hJK_V9dJdVzmtSJqqafue2ud9Q@mail.gmail.com> <54FAD0B2.8060601@multiplay.co.uk> <54FAD47B.7090007@sorbs.net> <54FADEBF.2060905@multiplay.co.uk> <54FAE018.8080509@sorbs.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On 07/03/2015 11:25, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Steven Hartland wrote:
>>
>> On 07/03/2015 10:35, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>>> Steven Hartland wrote:
>>>> There are lots of fixes for ZFS issues in 10 so I'd recommend updated
>>>> to 10.1-RELEASE to see if you issue is already resolved there.
>>>>
>>> Question is will the fixes be applied to 9.4?  Will there be a 9.4?
>>>
>> Unlikely I now any changes I've been doing I've only been MFC'ing to
>> 10 not 9 or 8.
> I wouldn't expect 8 being that it's already at 8.4 therefore no more
> releases just patches...  but are we not getting a 9.4?  Should not the
> known issues that have been addresses have their fixes integrated?
>
I couldn't comment on if there will be a 9.4, even if there is I 
wouldn't expect all the fixes that are in 10 to be present if I'm 
honest, the team only has so much time so prioritising the latest 
releases is just something that's going to have to happen.

We're already had 10 and now 10.1 I'd say its time to upgrade ;-)





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54FAE513.3030107>