Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 22:10:25 -0000 From: "Boris S." <bst2006@dva.dyndns.org> To: Pascal Hofstee <caelian@gmail.com> Cc: current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ZFS vs Samba Debugging Results ... Need Help. Message-ID: <46633B27.50601@dva.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <d8a0b7620707031359wc178fdfocf2387820fcacbf5@mail.gmail.com> References: <d8a0b7620707031331w5b0fcae2jd96cb7ff8b3f34d6@mail.gmail.com> <d8a0b7620707031359wc178fdfocf2387820fcacbf5@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pascal Hofstee schrieb: > It looks like somehow gcc optimized out the actual assignment of dname ! FYI: Since I've compiled Samba with gcc 4.2.1 (from ports) samba works fine with ZFS shares! Boris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46633B27.50601>