Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:30:50 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>, arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: add inverse option to ministat
Message-ID:  <10B832D6-08CB-4D4A-910D-75808CDE6549@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <80033.1436992253@critter.freebsd.dk>
References:  <20150715002013.GZ8523@funkthat.com> <77609.1436942964@critter.freebsd.dk> <20150715071534.GE8523@funkthat.com> <78059.1436947590@critter.freebsd.dk> <20150715174139.GJ8523@funkthat.com> <80033.1436992253@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Apple-Mail=_0690CF42-3866-4D99-88FD-E78BA1D4EF01
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8


> On Jul 15, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> =
wrote:
>=20
> --------
> In message <20150715174139.GJ8523@funkthat.com>, John-Mark Gurney =
writes:
>=20
>> There are lots of tools the repeat functionality...  and it's only
>> getting worse...  And the amount of code that this adds is strikingly
>> small...
>=20
> We do agree that is not a coherent argument, right ?
>=20
> I still think it is a step in the wrong direction, and that it should
> therefore not be taken.

I agree that this is a step best not taken. This is ministat, and why =
are
we optimizing for this one use-case, when there=E2=80=99s dozens of =
other that
I=E2=80=99ve wished for over the years. What=E2=80=99s next -l for =
log(x) and -e for exp(x)?

But if reason doesn=E2=80=99t prevail, can we at least name it right? =
The current name
isn=E2=80=99t quite appropriate. You=E2=80=99re transitioning from time =
domain to the frequency
domain, and just saying that it=E2=80=99s inverse.

Warner


--Apple-Mail=_0690CF42-3866-4D99-88FD-E78BA1D4EF01
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVpxdaAAoJEGwc0Sh9sBEALMAQAMfFvY5GXbb0Czn/0TWVW/pd
ZV/oC/VrJjd8PAu7IYvDBjgbAwlmmbf/Djnq87D2TgdIyE78KTPSnZ2OFCYpjp0s
DVI0K4ujult9cx1rTF8T7oV0y4hbLMZNC8XjflehuetS9QNicd/0pxVFjRh+f6e1
GsIjJNJ/r5qU21DSDCGiQUlkK6qe3VK0sp5hrWLQR80Jqlcn/77Ky03+Sl4mGpJ8
dEOO+sPxwLjRKIWQedesqGg5XkPDIgvw+9KknrHm/3QlBIV3aWTh+Ol0V0+CHLTE
JCcm7qZHXm39fJq72JR6bKFfNrFi4R3oQVXyQ4U6i1YzRnVnzqY1LeXVl6t6VarL
kktNCIzK0z7IVlc0UFdtPI2l2vvvY7Ky+6/dRntZjL3aOshsujtU9SssOpORMdVE
1IkCiMUKgU8Kpyn0gKay+UeWFsLHU56+GTym0Wx/hWc8G7PTEgPsB2c/0Z2lVSaO
+DgkFqV2PCKEI8wTcf5FjaGfG+Rcf0APQtNp7H/yXiRqCVceiul4v2Ueoo4tZq70
uDGhy1VfrxQj8sWn0pVKsKmxfm3GT6ltcyOmLetq7j7NRhkGWw5qYazzEi5ytth0
mQscIlQ4EyHhDyOFcLqkMxB0Pf4POoDOaPJJollzMgx9DC/3dHyhV4LZoAVUacgP
hQvtmNWVpDvx/9IEp31r
=ynER
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_0690CF42-3866-4D99-88FD-E78BA1D4EF01--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10B832D6-08CB-4D4A-910D-75808CDE6549>