Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 13:50:11 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: Jonathan <jonathan@sirtis.org.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Use linux_base-debian instead of linux_base? Message-ID: <873ch9j63g.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> In-Reply-To: <3F12E1FE.5070101@sirtis.org.uk> (jonathan@sirtis.org.uk's message of "Mon, 14 Jul 2003 18:01:50 %2B0100") References: <87k7aljbvb.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> <3F12E1FE.5070101@sirtis.org.uk>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
At 2003-07-14T17:01:50Z, Jonathan <jonathan@sirtis.org.uk> writes:
Jonathan,
> Take a look at portupgrade (/usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade) which has
> portinstall, which you can use instead of cd /usr/ports/blah/blah && make
I've been using portupgrade for ages, but I hadn't thought about using it to
work around the problem.
> Then you can configure in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf using
> ALT_PKGDEP. The sample in the config says:
> # ALT_PKGDEP = {
> # # If you use apache13-modssl instead of apache13
> # 'apache-1.3.*' => 'apache+mod_ssl-1.3.*',
I've added this to my pkgtools.conf (and the portupgrade port is the current
version):
ALT_PKGDEP = {
'linux_base' => 'linux_base-debian'
}
but it doesn't seem to make a difference. Do I have to do something to make
portinstall aware of that setting?
--
Kirk Strauser
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQA/Evtm5sRg+Y0CpvERAh1JAJ9HT9pBVZCAwaAZKUFLd+zWOkl+4QCfQdFV
E9FkItFbGnxbFa2jASByiRs=
=19IW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?873ch9j63g.fsf>