Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 13:17:06 +0400 (MSD) From: Alexey Pialkin <pialkin@abel.pdmi.ras.ru> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: ache@nagual.ru, spblug@tsctube.spb.su, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATAPI patch Message-ID: <199609130917.NAA00968@abel.pdmi.ras.ru> In-Reply-To: <13048.842599702@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Sep 13, 96 00:28:22 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I don't sure about anything :) For example - my Panasonic 572B doesn't need > > any delays at all.But GoldStar does.So i don't realy know which one are > > neccessary and which not :( > > I think what he was wondering was whether you'd managed to make the > GoldStar work with any *less* delays, e.g. is each and every one of them > known to be necessary? Ugh. Got a point. Yeah - i think it is possible to stay DELAYs only in atapi_probe() - all others are not so neccesary. P.S. sorry for such unended patch - but as i said before it's just a hack to get work CDROM. I hope someone sometime will able to write complet ATAPI driver and we will remeber this prolems just as a nightmare that have passed :) Alexey Pialkin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609130917.NAA00968>