Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 01:37:11 -0700 From: Harshavardhana <harsha@harshavardhana.net> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Jordan Hubbard <jordanhubbard@me.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD support being added to GlusterFS Message-ID: <CAAeUqd3%2Bm9A6SAtZF5VM2oLzuA9r_cR2p9sxfrsCdOcYXNM4dQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20140628071735.GF34108@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <C647EDA1-EA93-4A66-B59D-3B5F959DC0E0@gluster.org> <6ADBB2BF-C7E8-4050-9278-2565A63D2EA8@gluster.org> <20140627070411.GI24440@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <AB0CB58A-A93E-4DDA-8060-A2B183BBB6FD@turbofuzz.com> <20140627223456.GD34108@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <EF01BB42-EEBE-4F59-A066-5C18E3F1CAC6@me.com> <20140628070433.GE34108@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <CAAeUqd2KVEPnuvMS1X=OAWzBxft2ihyoOOHYgGPFdWFpod_OpQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140628071735.GF34108@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > it is better imho to uses the one we have in ports, has it receives the normal > maintainance and avoid having to do the job twice, and it is simpler has well as > that makes be not having to use autogen.sh but rather use regular macros to > regenerate the configure/Makefiles The tarball was provided only as a placeholder and its interim to run "./autogen.sh" it is not necessary on an official release which comprises of "./configure" . In-fact argp-standalone is the one tested and blessed (since one cannot guarantee what a FreeBSD port might diverge into) -- Religious confuse piety with mere ritual, the virtuous confuse regulation with outcomes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAAeUqd3%2Bm9A6SAtZF5VM2oLzuA9r_cR2p9sxfrsCdOcYXNM4dQ>