Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 11:42:41 -0400 (EDT) From: John Von Essen <john@essenz.com> To: Jett Tayer <jett@angdatingdaan.org> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rndc reload and BIND9 Message-ID: <20050706113803.X24781@beck.quonix.net> In-Reply-To: <52676.202.175.229.210.1120663380.squirrel@mail.angdatingdaan.org> References: <3b88b80a0507051933f4750f3@mail.gmail.com><06ef01c581f6$c54fb3c0$de0a0a0a@visionsix.com> <20050706105612.W22721@beck.quonix.net> <52676.202.175.229.210.1120663380.squirrel@mail.angdatingdaan.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Even though it doesn't receive a notify, dont the slave zones do a refresh anyway every X number of seconds (where X is specified in the zone file). Also, we have to account for when we add a new domain/zone (which is often). We will have to modify the main config file on the slave and issue an rndc reload anyway. -John On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Jett Tayer wrote: > a master/slave relationship is better. and will only "zone transfer" what > has changed :) > > > > > > Following a post I had about BIND9, I need to verify a certain behavior > > with BIND9 and issuing a rndc reload. > > > > Instead, of having a master and slave, I am going to have two masters. One > > master is the real master, the other gets replicated via rsync. The main > > reason for this approach is to cut down on all the zone transfers (we > > have 12,000 domains). > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050706113803.X24781>