Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 12:49:01 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: anders@hack.org, phk@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release Makefile Message-ID: <20021231204901.GA87057@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20021231.141530.100232295.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <200212311517.gBVFHOVE046201@repoman.freebsd.org> <20021231153531.GA726@hellraiser.andersa.net> <20021231175547.GA85448@dragon.nuxi.com> <20021231.141530.100232295.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 02:15:30PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : Well, this change will probably go back in -- PHK did a 100% against the > : rules back out of my commit. I haven't seen any bug reports in > : freebsd-current or my inbox about my commit upping the the size causing > : problems. > > This is not 100% against the rules. You committed something, things > broke, phk restored the status quo while things could be resolved. > Standard operating proceedure as far as I can tell. I'd go with maybe > 10-20% against the rules for not emailing you first, but 100% > overstates things too much. If this isn't 100% against the rules then why the fck did I land in the box for doing just this the end of October?!? Things were not BROKE. "make release" built. One of many code paths seems to have a bug. Again just like happened with libfetch in October. (except I didn't get any bug report) Also can a committer back out a maintainer approved commit w/o asking the maintainer first? re@ is the maintainer of release/Makefile and my commit had their full backing. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021231204901.GA87057>