Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:00:04 -0500 From: Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iSCSI vs. SMB with ZFS. Message-ID: <CACpH0Me7KVFTUGE7S0PjPQ_%2BrpFEOd7t0r74ZyooZ2gVcd4Rsg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1886761249.1455682.1355777126858.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212171743340.1564@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1886761249.1455682.1355777126858.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Does windows 7 support nfs v4, then? Is it expected (ie: is it worthwhile trying) that nfsv4 would perform at a similar speed to iSCSI? It would seem that this at least requires active directory (or this user name mapping ... which I remember being hard).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACpH0Me7KVFTUGE7S0PjPQ_%2BrpFEOd7t0r74ZyooZ2gVcd4Rsg>