Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 11:53:07 +0100 From: "beepc.ch" <xpetrl@beepc.ch> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Benchmarks: FreeBSD 13 vs. NetBSD 9.2 vs. OpenBSD 7 vs. DragonFlyBSD 6 vs. Linux Message-ID: <593933b6-de09-f879-6e0f-f895a685555d@beepc.ch> In-Reply-To: <CAEW%2BogaXmG6hm%2B9NcKYfYDJB7mx2V=cN8DoyvZvUwMhkvkJNvQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2BGLnbgVGghYAYPbQfu0H0cGvXxk-v0jAZTxLLz%2BhRn5eXjP0g@mail.gmail.com> <f8e569a4-3510-5a91-62b2-f9080b197ebc@beepc.ch> <CAEW%2BogaXmG6hm%2B9NcKYfYDJB7mx2V=cN8DoyvZvUwMhkvkJNvQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, > Is there any tunibg guide(s) to make the default not conservative in a > regrding to several use cases like using as web server? - FreeBSD Handbook, Chapter 12. Configuration and Tuning - section 12.12. Tuning with sysctl(8) > Just to be clear I almost not used linux and always freebsd for simplicity > usage.. but I must say it makes me wonder > > Sami > > בתאריך שבת, 11 בדצמ׳ 2021, 11:52, מאת beepc.ch <xpetrl@beepc.ch>: > >>> I am surprised to see that the BSD cluster today has much worse >> performance >>> than Linux. >>> What do you think of this? >> >> "Default" FreeBSD install setting are quite conservative. >> The Linux common distros are high tuned, those benchmark is in my >> opinion comparison of apples and oranges. >> >> Comparing "default" FreeBSD install with "default" Slackware install >> would be more interesting, because Slackware builds are at most vanilla. >> >> >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?593933b6-de09-f879-6e0f-f895a685555d>