Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:41:39 +0400 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>, Warner Losh <wlosh@bsdimp.com>, Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Subject: Re: terminfo Message-ID: <20140226124139.GB79819@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <86ios31he9.fsf@nine.des.no> References: <5304A0CC.5000505@FreeBSD.org> <CAJOYFBCMS4k7pyRk2YHZm81F6iP=SApZhbCm0MO4P-pvXbTCxQ@mail.gmail.com> <1392997589.1145.91.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <C5D5EB8F-93FA-419A-B3B9-F4E53EEEB220@bsdimp.com> <86ios31he9.fsf@nine.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 01:55:10PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Warner Losh <wlosh@bsdimp.com> writes: > > I've had good luck with TERM=vt100 in those situations, but I use tip > > and apart from eating ^P it does a good job of being transparent > > enough... > > Am I the only one still using plain, unadorned cu(1)? I too
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140226124139.GB79819>