Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 21:29:18 +0000 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org> To: Nik Clayton <nik@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 5-Stable Roadmap and the docs Message-ID: <20030222212918.GB8729@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20030221204650.GP6403@clan.nothing-going-on.org> References: <20030221163750.GA25075@submonkey.net> <20030221204650.GP6403@clan.nothing-going-on.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 08:46:50PM +0000, Nik Clayton wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 04:37:50PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > Since at the moment RELENG_4 and CURRENT have some disparities, I think we
> > have three options:
> >
> > i) Branch the doc/ tree;
> >
> > ii) Abandon the "doc/ reflects life with -stable" approach;
> >
> > iii) Muddle through adding <note>s, etc and get ourselves in a state.
> >
> > Which one should we be going for ?
>
> (i) is likely to be a pain to manage. I don't think (ii) is realistic,
> given that we're not suggesting that people migrate en masse to 5.0 yet.
> Which leaves (iii)...
That's what I thought.
> > Also, I think now is a good time to kill all 2.x and 3.x stuff from
> > the docs. I could be convinced that 3.x should stay - I'm unshakeable
> > on 2.x, but that doesn't mean I'm about to barge ahead and do it.
>
> 2.x can go. I wouldn't personally lose sleep if we removed information
> that was solely pertinent to 3.x either.
Sweet.
Ceri
--
User: DO YOU ACCEPT JESUS CHRIST AS YOUR PERSONAL LORD AND SAVIOR?
Iniaes: Sure, I can accept all forms of payment.
-- www.chatterboxchallenge.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030222212918.GB8729>