Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:18:15 -0400 From: John Baldwin <john@baldwin.cx> To: "Joao Barros" <joao.barros@gmail.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] amr(4) testers needed... Message-ID: <200607131418.16023.john@baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <70e8236f0607130819h155c8a46yc38eacb39378e30c@mail.gmail.com> References: <200607111451.22749.john@baldwin.cx> <70e8236f0607130819h155c8a46yc38eacb39378e30c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 13 July 2006 11:19, Joao Barros wrote: > On 7/11/06, John Baldwin <john@baldwin.cx> wrote: > > I have a patch for amr(4) that is a forward-port of a Scott Long patch for 4.x > > that fixes some severe data corruption with amr(4) + PAE on 4.x with > 4GB of > > RAM. I need the patch tested on current though so I can get it into HEAD and > > eventually into 4.x. The patch for head is at > > http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/amr_head.patch It shouldn't break > > anything and should basically be a nop. I think the patch will apply to 6.x > > (and possibly 5.x) as well. Thanks! > > > > I can test it on i386 without PAE. Is that test enough? Yes, thanks! -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200607131418.16023.john>