Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 09:41:04 +0200 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GCC withdraw Message-ID: <20130824074104.GA31021@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <52180DD0.3080308@freebsd.org> References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org> <5217413A.9080105@passap.ru> <20130823111647.GT2951@home.opsec.eu> <52174D51.2050601@digsys.bg> <21414.1377258940@critter.freebsd.dk> <5217A7D8.1030806@freebsd.org> <1377285836.31114.13416825.5F534A08@webmail.messagingengine.com> <52180DD0.3080308@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 09:35:12AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 8/24/13 3:23 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013, at 13:20, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> On 8/23/13 7:55 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >>> In message <52174D51.2050601@digsys.bg>, Daniel Kalchev writes: > >>> > >>>>> - 9.x gcc default and clang in base; > >>>>> - 10.x clang default and gcc in ports; > >>>> I believe this is the best idea so far. As long as these ports work with > >>>> gcc in ports, that is. > >>> +1 > >>> > >> well as I was forced to go back to gcc to get a compiling & running > >> kernel on my VPS (xen) > >> I'm not convinced that clang is there yet. I'd be really grumpy if I > >> had to go through al the ports hoopla to recompile my kernel. > >> > >> > > Curious which Xen version. I'd like to try to replicate this issue. I've > > seen FreeBSD 10 run just fine on XenServer 6.0 and 6.2. > I don't know.. whatever RootBSD run, but the fact that I needed gcc > for anything suggests that we should keep it around for a while. Why do you need to use gcc for everything? What happens if you use clang? Be specific, without details this is just FUD. Romanhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130824074104.GA31021>