Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 14:13:12 -0700 From: Weongyo Jeong <weongyo.jeong@gmail.com> To: Gustau P??rez <gperez@entel.upc.edu> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for Test and Review: bwn(4) - another Broadcom Wireless driver Message-ID: <20100515211312.GB1295@weongyo> In-Reply-To: <4BEEB792.3040105@entel.upc.edu> References: <20100303082833.GB22865@weongyo> <20100303111014.6564ea1e.ray@dlink.ua> <20100312231333.GZ1295@weongyo> <4BD2201E.3090409@entel.upc.edu> <20100424231755.GI65380@weongyo> <4BD4A928.8020901@entel.upc.edu> <20100506190653.GA31100@weongyo> <58220.88.15.97.205.1273248485.squirrel@webmail.entel.upc.edu> <20100510195622.GA1295@weongyo> <4BEEB792.3040105@entel.upc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 05:02:42PM +0200, Gustau P??rez wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > En/na Weongyo Jeong ha escrit: > > On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:08:05PM +0200, Gustavo Perez Querol wrote: > >>> Hello Gustau, I'm so sorry for belated response that I had no time to > >>> read and work email and wireless stuffs. > >>> > >>> Could you please test this symptom with attached patch? It looks in > >>> CURRENT it missed to initialize a ratectl when it associates with AP. > >>> > >> The patch made the machine to panic. I think it happened when launching > >> the supplicant. In fact, right now it works by putting the RF switch to > >> OFF. As soon as I change it to ON the machine panics. > >> > >> It get a trap 12, with two reasons : page fault and "bufwrite, buffer is > >> not busy?" > >> > >> I'm running 9.0/AMD64 from 1 of May (don't know exact svn revision). > >> > >> Do you want me to test anything else ? > > > > OK. The patch is ready to test. Could you please test it with attached > > patch? > > > > regards, > > Weongyo Jeong > > > > It worked fine with current. I still haven't tested it a few hours, > let's see if it works. Thanks ! > > However, right now I'm testing zfs with the same laptop (with a > different HDD) and unfortunately I'm seeing the same with STABLE. > Tons of : > > "bwn0: unsupported rate 0" > > I wonder if the patch you sent will work with stable's source code ... Recently the ratectl framwork was MFC to STABLE_8 so it could cause this problem. I'll MFC my patch to STABLE_8 as soon as possible. regards, Weongyo Jeong
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100515211312.GB1295>