Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 18:18:04 +0400 From: Kamigishi Rei <spambox@haruhiism.net> To: barbara <barbara.xxx1975@libero.it> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "glen.j.barber" <glen.j.barber@gmail.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD-8 and portsnap Message-ID: <4A6C659C.9010600@haruhiism.net> In-Reply-To: <KNE7BE$52FFD73D782F6FA63E2EAFCC0B6339D5@libero.it> References: <KNE7BE$52FFD73D782F6FA63E2EAFCC0B6339D5@libero.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
barbara wrote: > If you remove those files and run portsnap fetch update again, you will find only fresh INDEX-[5-7]. > Maybe it's caused by the fact INDEX-8 is not built on portsnap servers, but I really don't know. > Apparently, I can confirm this. I use portsnap fetch extract to populate my /usr/ports tree on all my systems, and on 8-CURRENT machines 8-INDEX seems missing. -- Kamigishi Rei KREI-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A6C659C.9010600>