Date: Fri, 4 Apr 1997 14:10:58 +0200 (MET DST) From: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@korin.warman.org.pl> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 && -current Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970404140638.13063C-100000@korin.warman.org.pl> In-Reply-To: <199704031529.KAA04612@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 3 Apr 1997, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> <<On Thu, 3 Apr 1997 16:06:41 +0200 (MET DST), Andrzej Bialecki <abial@korin.warman.org.pl> said:
>
> > What is the status of IPv6 implementation under -current? I'd be probably
> > interested in setting up a machine and a tunnel to 6bone, so I would
> > gladly use FreeBSD for this, if it's possible...
>
> I am aware of two implementations out there, and the unfortunate truth
> is that both of them suck, in different ways. (Although at least one
> of them, I am told, is getting significantly better stylistically.)
> Until this situation changes a bit more (or we find someone interested
> in doing an IPv6 implementation that obeys style(9) and isn't
> altogether bletcherous), there should not be IPv6 code in the -current
> kernel.
Hmmm... some time ago there was a port of NRL code to FreeBSD 2.1.x, I
think. Does it mean someone from FreeBSD developers {is doing,has done}
anything with this?
Sincerely yours,
---
Andrzej Bialecki FreeBSD: Turning PCs Into Workstations
<abial@warman.org.pl> http://www.freebsd.org
Research and Academic Network in Poland
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.95.970404140638.13063C-100000>