Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Jan 1999 18:33:28 +0900
From:      Masafumi =?iso-2022-jp?B?TkFLQU5FLxskQkNmOiwybUo4GyhC?= <max@wide.ad.jp>
To:        billf@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        max@wide.ad.jp
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/net/portscanner - Imported sources
Message-ID:  <19990120183328H.masafumi@aslm.rim.or.jp>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 17 Nov 1998 12:46:44 -0800 (PST)" <199811172046.MAA02894@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <199811172046.MAA02894@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Another comment regarding  pretty old commit.

     > billf       1998/11/17 12:46:44 PST
     > ports/net/portscanner - Imported sources
     > Update of /home/ncvs/ports/net/portscanner
     > In directory freefall.freebsd.org:/x/tmp/cvs-serv2866
  
     > Log Message:
     > Initial import of portscanner, a quick and dirty way to scan ports
     > similar to strobe, but much quicker, and good for use in scripts and CGI.
  
While the net category seems okay for this port as strobe is alson in
the net category, another port scanning tool, nmap, resides in the
security category.  We need consistency here, I think.  Maybe we
should move nmap from the security to the net category?

Thoughts?

     Cheers,
Max

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990120183328H.masafumi>