Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 10:23:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: ticso@cicely.de, Alexander Kabaev <ak03@gte.com>, ticso@cicely5.cicely.de, des@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: alpha tinderbox failure - kernel is broken. Message-ID: <200209031723.g83HNccd043025@apollo.backplane.com> References: <20020903163714.049602A7D6@canning.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:
:Yes, imgact_elf.c rev 1.121 is the culprit. Reverting that change solves
:the problem.
:
:It should probably be backed out and un-MFC'ed. *definately* un-MFC'ed.
:
:Cheers,
:-Peter
:--
:Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
:"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
I have an alpha, let me try to reproduce this (it may take a while).
The datasize limit is fairly straight forward, either the failure
is for real or there is an accounting problem somewhere.
What happens if you replace this check in imgact_elf.c with a
printf of the conditional clauses instead of generating a failure?
+ if (data_size >
+ imgp->proc->p_rlimit[RLIMIT_DATA].rlim_cur ||
+ text_size > maxtsiz ||
+ data_size + text_size >
+ imgp->proc->p_rlimit[RLIMIT_VMEM].rlim_cur) {
+ error = ENOMEM;
+ goto fail;
+ }
Does that unbreak it? That would tell us which clause is causing
the failure. You can probably do this faster then I can build
a new world and kernel for my alpha.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200209031723.g83HNccd043025>