Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 21:10:53 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, Robert Simmons <rsimmons0@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze? Message-ID: <4FF513CD.4090308@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201207050408.WAA11175@lariat.net> References: <CA%2BQLa9B-Dm-=hQCrbEgyfO4sKZ5aG72_PEFF9nLhyoy4GRCGrA@mail.gmail.com> <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <201207042156.PAA09080@lariat.net> <4FF4BDA8.50303@FreeBSD.org> <201207050408.WAA11175@lariat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/04/2012 21:08, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 04:03 PM 7/4/2012, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> Other than that, if whoever actually pushes all the rocks uphill to make
>> the installer more modular in this regard decides to include djbdns,
>> more power to them. :)
>
> I'm not suggesting that everyone will prefer djb, and the last thing I
> want to do is start a religious war regarding the merits of different
> resolvers or the efficacy of DNSSEC. I'm merely asking that any change
> to the base system or the installation procedure allow me to choose this
> or any of the other most popular resolvers, at install time, with as
> little pain as possible.
And as usual, your patches to implement that feature are eagerly
anticipated.
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FF513CD.4090308>