Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:03:42 -0800 From: Jamie Lawrence <jal@thirdage.com> To: ob1k <ob1k@mindspring.com>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: disapointing security architecture Message-ID: <4.1.19990310200031.03cd4b20@204.74.82.151> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903102221380.294-100000@Cupcake.mindspring. com> References: <4.1.19990310191337.03cdced0@204.74.82.151>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:23 PM 3/10/99 +0000, ob1k wrote: > > >oh, Im sorry...I thought it was called _FREE_bsd OS, I was aware that the >approach was a WHOAREYOUPAYINGbsd. Thank you. 1) That was a private message. Posting private messages to mailing lists is rude. 2) It is a free OS. That doesn't mean you get to make random demands that other people jump to provide. You want something? Do it or convince someone to do it for you. I suggest you go learn the definition of free in terms of free software and then come back and play. 3) I won't clutter the list with this any further. (The reason I sent it privately in the first place. -j >On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Jamie Lawrence wrote: > >> At 08:47 PM 3/10/99 +0000, you wrote: >> > >> >Im sorry, but comments like: >> > 3. disappointed about FreeBSD security architecture? Fix it. >> >are such a copout and a really lame way of reasoning. >> >> Not even. Who are you paying to fix it for you? >> >> -j To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.1.19990310200031.03cd4b20>