Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:44:09 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Antal Rutz <arutz@mimoza.pantel.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly? Message-ID: <xzp3cakul86.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net> (Antal Rutz's message of "Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:39:03 %2B0100") References: <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Antal Rutz <arutz@mimoza.pantel.net> writes:
> I just read the status report of the year 2003 from DragonFlyBSD.
> I ask (not only) myself why don't we have something like this monthly or=
=20
> bi-monthly.
We used to, but it proved to be too hard to get people to actually
send in material for the report. There are basically two ways to do
this:
1) get committers to submit status reports about the work they have
done or are currently doing. Doesn't seem to work.
2) have somebody keep track of everything that happens and write it
down. Nobody has volunteered so far (though bmah@ does it to some
extent with the release notes)
DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp3cakul86.fsf>