Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 20:10:01 +0000 From: John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: John Birrell <jb@FreeBSD.org>, Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 134831 for review Message-ID: <20080205201001.GB24780@what-creek.com> In-Reply-To: <20080205182026.D49855@fledge.watson.org> References: <200802050929.m159Tc2s024644@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080205182026.D49855@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:21:10PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, John Birrell wrote: > > >http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=134831 > > > >Change 134831 by jb@jb_freebsd1 on 2008/02/05 09:29:08 > > > > We define FOPEN_MAX as 20. What a joke. > > I thought the comment was entertaining, apparently I'd never noticed that > before: > > /* > * FOPEN_MAX is a minimum maximum, and is the number of streams that > * stdio can provide without attempting to allocate further resources > * (which could fail). Do not use this for anything. > */ > > Some piece of code clearly loses on this front..? Yes, our awk. When I add another temporary file to sys/kern/makesyscalls.sh, awk can't handle it. "one-true-awk .... except when you need to use gawk." hehe -- John Birrell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080205201001.GB24780>