Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:52:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Kelly Yancey <kbyanc@posi.net> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/tools/tools/nanobsd ... Message-ID: <20050613145157.Q43977@gateway.posi.net> In-Reply-To: <p06210266becf5fcd9731@[128.113.24.47]> References: <200504132122.j3DLMKHa089226@repoman.freebsd.org> <p06210266becf5fcd9731@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> Back on April 13/2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> > Modified files:
> > tools/tools/nanobsd make.conf
> > Log:
> > sort and expand the prunelist in a more or less generally sensibly
> > order. Put some strategic comments in about how much storage is
> > necessary and a longer explanation on the top.
> >
> > It is now pretty trivial to put nanoBSD on as little as a 64MB
> > CF card.
>
> Are any macros defined (-D) in CFLAGS when building for nanoBSD,
> or other "please make a smaller system" situations? ISTR some
> value to check via #ifdef, but now I can't remember what it was
> or where I saw it used.
>
At least camcontrol conditionalizes functionality based on the
definition of MINIMALISTIC.
Kelly
--
Kelly Yancey - kbyanc@{posi.net,FreeBSD.org} - kelly@nttmcl.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050613145157.Q43977>