Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 19:49:03 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: grog@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/devd Makefile Message-ID: <20030819.194903.10922727.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20030820011509.GM20240@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20030819.092307.61268786.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030819195848.GA32622@madman.celabo.org> <20030820011509.GM20240@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20030820011509.GM20240@wantadilla.lemis.com>
"Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: On Tuesday, 19 August 2003 at 14:58:48 -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:23:07AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: >> There were two issues with making devd static: 1) it is a lot smaller
: >> than haging libstd++ (which isn't the case for all the other
: >> libraries) and 2) there were issues with crunchgen and c++ programs.
: >> Making it static just cleans things up a bit.
: >
: > but wait, i'm about to commit new, rewritten ls(1), echo(1), rm(1)
: > and a few others. they are all in C++ (C is obsolete). probably it now
: > makes sense to move libstdc++.so.4 to /lib?
:
: Once this transition is complete, we should ask ourselves why we still
: need /usr/bin, /usr/lib and /usr/sbin.
Or even /usr
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030819.194903.10922727.imp>