Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2000 10:00:07 -0600 (MDT) From: "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich@lanl.gov> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0004070958260.11132-100000@mini.acl.lanl.gov> In-Reply-To: <38EDD209.421EF9B0@tdnet.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Gustavo V G C Rios wrote: > What all you think about that ? I think you need to do a literature search for, oh, say, six months and get back to us. You'll need to read ca. 256-512 or so articles. I'm not kidding. You should start reading papers from the 1960s. And oh yes, don't ignore Plan 9 just because it doesn't fit a convenient category. Also, go ahead and look at NT, but put it in the "successful marketing covering for bad implementation" column. ron To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.20.0004070958260.11132-100000>