Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 02:42:46 -0700 From: "Pat Maddox" <pat@patmaddox.com> To: freebsd-cloud@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Current status of ZFS AMIs on EC2? Message-ID: <60E1F943-9C3C-4265-B7EC-F49680B9262B@patmaddox.com> In-Reply-To: <65D39FF2-C14D-430E-A83B-0C3606E0D7AF@patmaddox.com> References: <65D39FF2-C14D-430E-A83B-0C3606E0D7AF@patmaddox.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=_MailMate_E0509714-84B9-4F4E-BF2B-1048A8CCCC17_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed; markup=markdown Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Also, is there a 13.0-release ZFS AMI? On 23 Sep 2021, at 1:49, Pat Maddox wrote: > Hi there, I came across Colin’s 2019 post announcing ZFS AMIs for > EC2 [1]. I haven’t seen any more recent information regarding ZFS on > EC2. I’ve launched one instance, and it appears to work fine from > initial tests (including recovering a known working boot env using > beadm). > > I have also installed the official 12 and 13 releases, and see that > they are UFS. > > I have two questions: > > 1. Is anyone using the ZFS AMIs for production? > 2. Why has ZFS not been incorporated into the official releases? > > Thanks, > Pat > > [1] > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-cloud/2019-February/000200.html --=_MailMate_E0509714-84B9-4F4E-BF2B-1048A8CCCC17_=--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?60E1F943-9C3C-4265-B7EC-F49680B9262B>