Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 13:35:52 -0500 From: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.pp.ru>, "Crist J . Clark" <cjc@FreeBSD.ORG>, net@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NOARP - gateway must answer and have frozen ARP table Message-ID: <200112051835.fB5IZqH95521@whizzo.transsys.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Dec 2001 19:38:59 %2B0200." <20011205193859.B79705@sunbay.com> References: <20011205124430.A83642@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <20011205040316.H40864@blossom.cjclark.org> <20011205231735.A1361@grosbein.pp.ru> <20011205193859.B79705@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doesn't this behavior need to be on a per-interface basis? I'm wondering if a single sysctl is sufficient to get the desired effect. louie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112051835.fB5IZqH95521>