Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 21:04:47 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Kazutaka YOKOTA <yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: log(9) bug? or feature? Message-ID: <672.1002222287@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Oct 2001 20:55:07 %2B0900." <200110021155.UAA10794@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200110021155.UAA10794@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp>, Kazutaka YOK OTA writes: >In rev 1.67 and later, the message goes to the log buffer only if a >process is reading the log buffer. If no process is reading, the >message goes to the console ONLY, and it is not put into the log >buffer. This behavior is inconsistent with the above comment. Is this >a bug introduced in rev 1.67, or is it the intended new behavior and >the comment is out of date? Actually, I think this is consistent, since console messages is now also put in the buffer, but I am not 100% sure... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?672.1002222287>