Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:29:17 -0400 From: "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@gmail.com> To: Avleen Vig <lists-freebsd@silverwraith.com> Cc: Danny Pansters <danny@ricin.com> Subject: Re: Will 5.4 be an "Extended Life" release? Message-ID: <f34ca13c05042608296d4a8353@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20050426020924.GX29262@silverwraith.com> References: <20050412213328.GC1953@lava.net> <6.2.1.2.2.20050417185631.05349ee0@localhost> <200504180330.37184.danny@ricin.com> <20050426020924.GX29262@silverwraith.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25/04/05, Avleen Vig <lists-freebsd@silverwraith.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 03:30:37AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote: > > Let me just boldly insert that IMHO, if 6.X is going to become stable this > > autumn already that indeed 5.4 or maybe 5.5 at least one of those must be > > long-term-supported. I'm sure one of the two will, as one of the two will > > reflcet ultimately the walk-of-life of 5-STABLE, won't it? > > Why don't we just skip 6 and name it "FreeBSD X" or "FreeBSD 10" ? 'cause we ain't Apple. :-) Any suggestions to name it XP? :-) Constantine.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f34ca13c05042608296d4a8353>