Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 15:22:16 +0000 From: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> To: Vaevictus Asmadi <vae@nathanm.office.socket.net> Cc: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, Albert Yang <albert@achtung.com>, small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New approach to picobsd Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.20000124152057.00990910@192.168.255.1> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0001240834440.25894-100000@nathanm.office.so cket.net> References: <l0313030bb4b084f9b373@[194.32.164.2]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, At 08:38 24/01/00 -0600, Vaevictus Asmadi wrote: >unless it would be feasible for an unattended >/dev/fd0 /dev/fd1 two disk/two fdd situation.... Does the loader support multiple fdds? >On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Bob Bishop wrote: > > > At 14:55 +0800 22/1/00, Greg Lehey wrote: > > >[...] > > >In summary: what else do we need in PicoBSD? Do we need to do it in > > >one disk? > > > > A one-disk PicoBSD is absolutely required for use in unattended situations. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.0.58.20000124152057.00990910>