Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Apr 2013 07:15:12 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        Artyom Mirgorodskiy <artyom.mirgorodsky@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Atheros 9287 - no carrier . revision 249623.
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmonjttOR=EodmrCZtFuz53QYZOD3ZgARgBdSte7aV0wHjA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1789865.JtNRVqvDCl@home.alkar.net>
References:  <1645676.6Cz3TLlJG5@home.alkar.net> <CAJ-Vmo=Am4LVwSLvxSZ8ikuVDfre3s7aJfUX-vFycctSMPGXqw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonK107mEfT_G7BFDuiAHXwwUpFTrR703fs61vYTJX_spA@mail.gmail.com> <1789865.JtNRVqvDCl@home.alkar.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sigh.

Someone's broken the bus or interrupt handling code between -9 and
-head. Or ACPI, for all I know. It may even be something to do with
RFKILL.

Can you please boot verbosely, both on -9 and -head? you don't have to
do anything - just capture the logfile /var/run/dmesg.boot and attach
them here.

Hopefully something glaringly different will stand out.

Thanks,



adrian

On 18 April 2013 07:05, Artyom Mirgorodskiy
<artyom.mirgorodsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> No interrupts at all:
>
>
>
> interrupt total rate
>
> irq1: atkbd0 474 1
>
> irq9: acpi0 95 0
>
> irq22: ehci1 504 1
>
> irq23: ehci0 1037 3
>
> irq256: hpet0:t0 8426 30
>
> irq257: hpet0:t1 1823 6
>
> irq258: hpet0:t2 1992 7
>
> irq259: hpet0:t3 2112 7
>
> irq264: hdac0 118 0
>
> irq265: ahci0 4026 14
>
> Total 20607 75
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday 18 April 2013 06:56:14 Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> I've just tested -HEAD on a WB197 (AR9287 + bluetooth.) It works fine.
>
>>
>
>> I think it's very likely something to do with the bus enumeration. Can
>
>> you do a vmstat -i, see if you've seen any ath interrupts?
>
>>
>
>>
>
>>
>
>> adrian
>
> --
>
> Artyom Mirgorodskiy



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmonjttOR=EodmrCZtFuz53QYZOD3ZgARgBdSte7aV0wHjA>