Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 23:58:06 -0800 From: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> To: Frank Knobbe <frank@knobbe.us>, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup2 Message-ID: <200401252358.06064.wes@softweyr.com> In-Reply-To: <1075014010.789.21.camel@localhost> References: <20040122175800.UCGD116070.fep02-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@win2000> <200401221437.28629.skquinn@xevious.kicks-ass.net> <1075014010.789.21.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 24 January 2004 11:00 pm, Frank Knobbe wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 14:37, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> > On Thursday 2004 January 22 12:50, Craig Boston wrote:
> > > On Thursday 22 January 2004 12:10 pm, Will Andrews wrote:
> > > > So use another one? Like maybe cvsup12.freebsd.org? :)
> > >
> > > Sssshhh!!! Don't tell anybody about cvsup12...
> > > I like it being really really _FAST_ ;-)
> >
> > I personally use cvsup11 now. I think I switched several times after
> > cvsup2 started reaching capacity some months ago.
>
> This may be a silly question, but why doesn't cvsup.freebsd.org list
> all of the others in a round-robin setup? That way people can still use
> their preferred servers directly (e.g. cvsup11.), yet load can be
> distributed amongst all of them by just using cvsup.freebsd.org.
D00dz: ports/sys/utils/fastest_cvsup is your friend.
--
Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200401252358.06064.wes>