Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 16:53:47 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> Cc: freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bhyve + swtpm + W11 Message-ID: <881d8062-81b1-4a56-9296-e7852d226726@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <urdBLSWl9SUG67VE3iqoiBRqcvaroPH4Z4h7rCoyDF8OH8uWr3MKr2vSYdygItcMMqnrlXcPQot7dr1QlU7cB93nyciJeh5dCV5B04Nbkec=@xyinn.org> References: <031fe2e6-eae6-4d4a-8bce-cd7eadd0b5a6@netfence.it> <urdBLSWl9SUG67VE3iqoiBRqcvaroPH4Z4h7rCoyDF8OH8uWr3MKr2vSYdygItcMMqnrlXcPQot7dr1QlU7cB93nyciJeh5dCV5B04Nbkec=@xyinn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/27/25 15:41, Jonathan Vasquez wrote: > Not sure about that issue since I don’t use Windows 11 (I stayed on 10) but I did do some experiments a few months ago and documented how to bypass all of those requirements (including TPM) when installing 11 on bhyve. Maybe skipping it altogether can help get your setup running. You can take a look at my post here: Thanks, but I know how to work around TPM requirements and I'm not interested in that. A TPM module costs less than 10 Euros, so I'd prefer to go "official" in that way. What I'm asking is if swtpm is a viable alternative or if it simply doesn't work. bye & Thanks av.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?881d8062-81b1-4a56-9296-e7852d226726>