Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 10:58:33 -0400 From: Glen Barber <glen.j.barber@gmail.com> To: Kamigishi Rei <spambox@haruhiism.net>, barbara <barbara.xxx1975@libero.it> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD-8 and portsnap Message-ID: <4ad871310907260758h31030be1td42d36a59faf2cf2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A6C659C.9010600@haruhiism.net> References: <KNE7BE$52FFD73D782F6FA63E2EAFCC0B6339D5@libero.it> <4A6C659C.9010600@haruhiism.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Kamigishi Rei<spambox@haruhiism.net> wrote: > barbara wrote: >> >> If you remove those files and run portsnap fetch update again, you will >> find only fresh INDEX-[5-7]. >> Maybe it's caused by the fact INDEX-8 is not built on portsnap servers, >> but I really don't know. >> > > Apparently, I can confirm this. > I use portsnap fetch extract to populate my /usr/ports tree on all my > systems, and on 8-CURRENT machines 8-INDEX seems missing. > Out of curiosity, does 'portsnap fetch update -I' restore INDEX-8? I am not in front of my machine to test, at the moment. -- Glen Barber
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ad871310907260758h31030be1td42d36a59faf2cf2>