Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:27:21 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org> To: Andrius Morkunas <andrius@freebsd.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 179675 for review Message-ID: <AANLkTilmvDwJlMfH6XwIMu0V4oS-RkotnDVpFLbLhnmp@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201006161148.o5GBmrDq093951@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <201006161148.o5GBmrDq093951@repoman.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Andrius Morkunas <andrius@freebsd.org> wrote: > http://p4web.freebsd.org/@@179675?ac=10 > > Change 179675 by andrius@klevas on 2010/06/16 11:48:11 > > Add NO_USE_CC. > > If defined, NO_USE_CC forces USE_CC and USE_GCC to be ignored. > Before, there was no way to NOT respect USE_CC/USE_GCC variables. > > Affected files ... > > .. //depot/projects/soc2010/clangports/ports/Mk/bsd.compiler.mk#2 edit > > Differences ... > > ==== //depot/projects/soc2010/clangports/ports/Mk/bsd.compiler.mk#2 (text+ko) ==== > > @@ -3,6 +3,11 @@ > # PORTS_CXX should only be set if PORTS_CC is neither gcc nor clang > PORTS_CXX?= g++ > > +.if defined(NO_USE_CC) > +.undef USE_CC > +.undef USE_GCC > +.endif > + > # Handle USE_CC > .if defined(USE_CC) > # Check if port requires specific compiler > @@ -35,7 +40,6 @@ > > # Clang > .elif !empty(PORTS_CC:Mclang*) > -# TODO: handle something like USE_CLANG here when/if there's need for that > CC= clang > CXX= clang++ > .else Why not just check to see if CC is defined and empty? -Garretthelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTilmvDwJlMfH6XwIMu0V4oS-RkotnDVpFLbLhnmp>